Draft
Nuggets 2016: Entry #9
NFL Scouting Combine: Part One Offense
The 2016 NFL Scouting Combine is in the books. By this point
in the offseason, most teams have assessed their needs, circled their targets
in free agency (which begins March 9th) and have a pretty good idea
of what their draft board will look like. The Combine generally serves as an
affirmation of the scouting and game tape they have assembled. However,
occasionally a prospect’s performance (or interview/drug test) will send scouts
and GMs scrambling to rethink their evaluation, both in a positive or negative
way. Here are the players who most helped and hurt themselves at this year’s
Combine:
Stock UP
Dak Prescott, QB, Miss State – While Prescott looked
mostly as projected in drills, he really impressed in team interviews (by all
reports). A solid leader with real football intelligence has many teams
overlooking his accuracy concerns and has his stock as high as late 2nd-early
3rd and most likely the 5th QB off the board.
Ezekial Elliot, RB, Ohio State – It’s usually
difficult to raise your stock if you are already the #1 prospect at your
position, but Elliot absolutely owned the Combine. A 4.47 in the 40 and smooth
work in drills has him potentially in the Top 10 of this draft.
Daniel Lasco, RB, California – While probably best
served as a 3rd down/change-of-pace back, Lasco showed really
impressive explosiveness (4.46 in the 40, 41.5” vertical and 11’3” broad jump)
and strength (23 reps of 225lbs) for a man his size (6’ 209lbs) that should separate
him from the pack in rounds 3-5.
Josh Doctson, WR, TCU – Though not as tall as
reported in college (6’2” 202lbs), Doctson none the less vaulted easily into
the #2 WR on my board and with a late 1st-early 2nd round
grade. A 4.5 in the 40 and a 41” vertical in addition to smooth hand-catching
in drills shows why Doctson was so dominant at TCU.
Will Fuller, WR, Notre Dame – A 4.32 in the 40 is
bound to get you noticed but Fuller offered even more than that in drills.
While not ideal by size (6’0 186lbs and 8.25” hands) Fuller mastered the
gauntlet drill and looked like potentially the best deep threat in this WR
class.
Ben Braunecker, TE, Harvard – No report on if
Braunecker aced the Wunderlic test yet, but his Combine numbers were definitely
noticed. At 6’3” and 250lbs, Braunecker ran a 4.73 in the 40 and did 20 reps of
225lbs on the benchpress. A solid sleeper pick at TE.
Jack Conklin, OT, Michigan State – Conklin came into
the Combine as the #3 or #4 OT on some boards with questions of whether he
could play LT or would have to stay at RT. Conklin left the Combine as a
potential Top 15 pick with clear LT potential due to terrific footwork in
drills and 35” arms.
Le’Raven Clark, OT, Texas Tech – Clark has that
magical word attached to prospects with mixed game tape but excellent
measurables: POTENTIAL. The longest arms in the OT class (36.125”) and nice
mobility could have Clark sniffing the bottom of round 1 in April.
Ryan Kelly, C, Alabama – Kelly looked masterful
throughout the Combine and got rave reviews in meetings. It is rare to see a
center go in round 1, but Kelly has earned it with his Combine performance.
Christian Westerman, G, Arizona St – Most scouts saw
Westerman as a very mobile, zone-blocking scheme guard based on game tape. But
34 reps on the benchpress (the most among OL prospects) think he could be that
and more and cemented him in round 2.
Stock DOWN
Christian Hackenberg, QB, Penn State – After a
stellar freshman season, Hackenberg regressed at his time in Happy Valley. Some
attributed that to poor OL play or the loss of key weapons. But in drills at
the Combine, Hackenberg looked like he did in later years with poor footwork,
accuracy and poise. He seems like much more of a project late rounder than a
Day 2 guy.
Kenyan Drake, RB, Alabama – After a very impressive
Senior Bowl, Drake looked to be putting the injury concerns that plagued him at
Alabama behind him. However, with on 10 reps on the bench press (the worst
among RBs) Drake has shown his lack of time spent in the weight room
conditioning himself for the pro game. Drake seems like a KR specialist more
than a complimentary runner.
Rashard Higgins, WR, CSU – “Hollywood” Higgins showed
a lack of explosiveness hardly worthy of his nickname. Maybe he plays above his
statistics in games but that is probably a gamble worth taking no earlier than
Day 3 of the draft.
Hunter Henry, TE, Arkansas – Though still the #1 TE
on the board, Henry’s weak bench (13 reps) probably ends any thoughts of him
being 1st round talent.
Vadal Alexander, G/T, LSU – Though he played OT at
LSU and some at the Senior Bowl, Alexander’s complete lack of mobility in space
(illustrated by a 1.92 time in 10-yd split and a 8.04 in 3 cone drill) clearly
shows he is purely a guard prospect, though a very good one.
Nila Kasitai, G, Oklahoma – A lineman that only puts
up 12 reps on the bench is inexcusable. Kasitai is not even a draftable
prospect for me currently.